Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Not Just Cute

Whole Child Development

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Speaking
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Contact
  • New? Start Here.

Is There Danger in Play or More in Its Absence?

March 20, 2013 by notjustcute Filed Under: Learning through Play and Experience 17 Comments

As parents and caregivers, the safety of our children is our highest priority.  We ask them to wear their helmets while biking, to look before they leap, and we remind them again and again of the proper procedures for crossing the street.  We want them to be safe.  That’s reasonable and responsible.  But, as it is easy to do, we sometimes go a bit overboard on our efforts to protect our children.  In the long run, some of our efforts can backfire.

A piece in the New York Times, entitled, “Can a Playground Be Too Safe?”,  the author notes that the tall slides and adventurous climbing structures of our own childhood playgrounds have been replaced by tamer, assumedly more lawsuit-proof equipment.  While anyone with memories of asphalt-gnarled elbows or sunny-slide-burned thighs might be grateful for the progress, some researchers question if we’ve taken our safety measures too far, removing the opportunity for valuable play experiences.

Author of Last Child in the Woods, Richard Louv, cites that many parents keep children away from playing and exploring outdoors because they’re afraid of kidnappers, serial killers, and other crazies and kooks.  Unfortunately, too many children are harmed by adults, but the majority of those incidents involve family members, not strangers.  In fact, while our 24-hour news cycle makes us aware of every misdeed around the world, the truth of the matter is that, according to crime statistics, it’s actually safer for children to play outside than it was during many of our own childhoods.

Between our fear of strangers and injuries, our acceptance of push-down academic goals, and our society’s penchant for litigation, play spaces and play time are slowly disappearing from the lives of many children.  What is the cost of this trend?

In The American Journal of Play, research professor and prolific writer, Peter Gray compares research showing that the decrease of play in America seems to correlate with an increase of anxiety, depression, and other types of psychopathology.  It’s a connection that Gray strengthens with decades worth of research.

While research shows that child-led play is being replaced by school work, TV and computer time, and organized sports activities, concurrent studies also show an increase in psychopathology in children and adolescents.  These mental ills include things like anxiety, depression, and even narcissism.  While checking for other causes of psychopathology, this research found that American children are actually more anxious now than they were during the Great Depression, World War II, and the cold war.

So what would bring Gray to the conclusion that the connection between a reduction in play and the increase in psychopathology is not just correlation, but actually causation? 

The first point that is made in Gray’s article is the move from intrinsic motivation to extrinsic motivation.  Free play is purely intrinsically motivated.  Children play, explore, pretend, and build because they are driven by an internal sense of wonder and interest.  Conversely, many of the organized activities that have replaced children’s free play time over the years are linked to the extrinsic motivation of rewards, praise, or recognition.  Many of the activities are chosen and directed by grown-ups and are therefore generally predicated on their goals and objectives and the child often seeks to please the adults and their external standards for performance.

When children learn to care more about the judgments of others than their own internal drive, the result is often depression from not measuring up, or anxiety from the inability to control the perceptions of others.

Among his other reasons for supporting a causal relationship, Gray points out the role that play serves in building important decision-making skills, self-control, social skills, and emotional regulation.  Rough and tumble play, for example, while it is often restricted due to fears of injury, actually builds self-control as the implicit rules of “play fighting” include the fact that you can not actually hurt the other players — your friends.  This act of going to the line while holding back, requires a great deal of self-control while also recognizing and empathizing with the needs of others.

Perhaps it is the last reason Gray gives for the need for play that is most compelling.  “Social play makes children happy, and its absence makes them unhappy.”  It doesn’t take a degree in psychology to recognize that if one is deprived of that which makes them most happy, they are more vulnerable to diseases of unhappiness such as anxiety and depression.

Gray isn’t the only one drawing this causal relationship between a lack of free play and an increase in social, emotional, and mental plights.  In the New York Times piece, a pair of psychologists is quoted stating that, “Risky play mirrors effective cognitive behavioral therapy of anxiety“.  As children take risks, they learn to face and gradually conquer their fears.  Continuing, they note, “…we posit that our fear of children being harmed by mostly harmless injuries may result in more fearful children and increased levels of psychopathology.”

In his book, Louv suggests that many symptoms of ADHD are caused by, or at least can be effectively treated by the amount of time children spend exploring and playing in nature.

In his conclusion, Peter Gray sums up our misdirected concern for our children:

“Somehow, as a society, we have come to the conclusion that to protect children from danger and to educate them, we must deprive them of the very activity that makes them happiest and place them for ever more hours in settings where they are more or less continually directed and evaluated by adults, settings almost designed to produce anxiety and depression. If we wish children to be happy and to grow up to become socially and emotionally fulfilled and competent adults, we must provide them, once again, with opportunities to spend many hours per day playing freely with friends.”

Certainly, there is a place for an adequate amount of safety regulation.  Likewise, there is arguably a need for some degree of structure and adult direction.  But the theory that “if a little is good, a lot is better” is usually false, and nowhere does that seem to be more true than in the case of these “good things” that tend to push play from its prominent position in childhood.

We have to remember not to inadvertently trade these good things for the things that are best of all.

>>Looking for help promoting the role of play in your school?
Why We Play can help.  For more support, book a workshop or speaking engagement for your center!
 Resources:

John Tierney: Can a Playground Be Too Safe?, The New York Times, July 18, 2011.

Peter Gray: The Decline of Play and the Rise of Psychopathology in Children and Adolescents, The American Journal of Play, Vol. 3 No. 4.

Richard Louv:  Last Child in the Woods 

Top photo source.

Center photo source.

Bottom photo source.

Originally published in New Latina.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Comments

  1. 1

    Renee says

    March 20, 2013 at 8:40 am

    My girls have had their fair share of bump, scraps and bruises (not raising no china dolls here lol) and yes I do have certain rules of conducts that assure their safety like (don’t walk away with strangers etc…) they are not afraid to meeting and talking to adults and playgrounds are lots of fun for them 🙂

    Reply
  2. 2

    Alex | Perfecting Dad says

    March 20, 2013 at 9:33 am

    I pretty much with you on this (and I suppose transitively with Peter Gray, though I think he is drawing too strong a conclusion). Just personal memory. I used to walk to school from about grade 3. It was a half hour walk, maybe 12 blocks. It was me and a gang of my friends that lived on my street. We would wander through alleys on the way home, inspecting interesting treasures like a discarded record player. We would usually end up at one of our houses fooling around with how-made bows and arrows, or playing stunt games at the playground like who can fly the farthest off a swing, or in one of the nearby bushy areas playing tag or capture the flag type games. Granted, my two little fingers are crooked now from being broken and sprained too many times, but I don’t see the same kind of play anymore. My kids have very few friends within walking distance, they are bused to school, and I have a much harder time getting them to try fun yet risky things. It’s even worse with the friends they do have … everything is safety safety … gotta follow the rules. Have a look at this video, skip to about 2′ 15″ to see people who live 40 metres high in tree houses with little kids: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbWBV2YTxVI

    I’m pretty sure they do have more “child fell 40 metres” incidents, but it kinda makes you think that we’re going to far on the safety.

    Reply
  3. 3

    Lea says

    March 20, 2013 at 10:21 am

    Love this! Have you read “Let Them Play: An Early Learning ‘Un’Curriculum”? It’s by Jeff Johnson and Denita Dinger. Awesome book that defends the power of play. Many of your points are reiterated in this book. Check out either of their websites: Denita’s is http://www.PlayCounts.com, and Jeff’s is http://www.explorationsearlylearning.com. The book is also on Amazon.

    Reply
  4. 4

    Cris says

    March 20, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    I invite you to have a look at this web (which used to be a blog until recently):
    http://www.play-scapes.com/
    It compiles pictures of inspiring play spaces all over the world and also reflects on many of the things you mention in this post.
    Hope you like it

    Reply
  5. 5

    Claire says

    March 23, 2013 at 12:33 pm

    I remember reading the original playground article a few years ago, and I really can’t relate to it. In my experience, playgrounds today are much more fun than they were when I was growing up.

    Reply
  6. 6

    Emma says

    March 27, 2013 at 11:13 pm

    Totally agree… for some interesting thoughts along these lines (and shocking stories of “safety” taken WAY too far), check out http://www.freerangekids.com.
    The founder of that site, Lenore, once offered “free play lessons” at $350 for 8 weekly sessions, where she’d take your 10yr old kids to the playground at Central Park, give them her cell phone number (just in case) & then head to the nearest Starbucks & return after an hour. I’m pretty sure it was tongue-in-cheek, but she made the point that people are paying for all these scheduled activities (sports, music, languages, etc) but not making any time for free play, so maybe if she charged for free play, parents would realize that it’s just as important!
    Not sure I’m quite that confident to do with my own kids (although my eldest is only 3, maybe I’ll feel different when my kids are 10), but I love the idea & the intense discussions it started amongst my parent-friends!

    Reply
  7. 7

    BobTotans says

    March 28, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    Great article Amanda. As as a parent of five grown children, I have also found that quite a lot of parents are apathetic toward their children’s well-being as it relates to free play. It’s much easier to deal with their kids who sit in front of a TV or are plugged into a Sony Playstation.
    As part of a video series I’m producing to encourage children to engage in “old-time” play, I’ve been discouraged many times by a lack of interest on behalf of parents. It’s certainly a tough sell convincing new parents that the wonders of childhood can’t be found in a box.

    Reply
  8. 8

    Tina says

    April 23, 2013 at 10:14 pm

    The line that caught my eye was in one of the quotes from Peter Gray: “we must provide them (our children), once again, many hours per day playing freely with friends.”
    They need (yes, need!) this to become socially and emotionally fulfilled competent adults. They need hours of play a day, right now while they are young, to be socially and emotionally healthy children. However, how many kids actually get the hours they need? Having seen the ill effects on my children of all-day school in an “academic” environment, play seems needed now more than ever to provide emotional healing and meaningful learning experiences.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Suggested Reading for 3/22/13 | If I Ran the Circus says:
    March 22, 2013 at 11:29 am

    […] really great piece from Not Just Cute about the importance of risk in children’s play, and the dangers inherent in making things too safe. Really smart […]

    Reply
  2. Weekend Reading: March 23, 2013 | Life Your Way says:
    March 23, 2013 at 6:13 am

    […] Is There Danger in Play or More in Its Absence? | Not Just Cute […]

    Reply
  3. Read Along Series: Last Child in the Woods (Part 3) | Not Just CuteNot Just Cute says:
    June 4, 2013 at 2:20 am

    […] permanently; it can change the very structure of the brain.”  Much like I wrote in my post, Is There Danger in Play or More in its Absence?, the restriction of a child’s opportunity for reasonable adventure can warp the child’s […]

    Reply
  4. It’s OK NOT to Share Section 4a: Kids, Power, and Action (Part 1) | Not Just Cute says:
    April 22, 2014 at 2:06 am

    […] (Read more on this in my post Is There Danger in Play or More in its Absence?) […]

    Reply
  5. Weekend Reading: March 23, 2013 says:
    August 4, 2014 at 10:20 pm

    […] Is There Danger in Play or More in Its Absence? | Not Just Cute […]

    Reply
  6. The Parent Watercooler - Lasso the Moon says:
    January 23, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    […] Is There Danger in Play or More in Its Absence? :: Not Just Cute […]

    Reply
  7. How Should We Protect Children? : Read Along Section Two – What if Everybody Understood Child Development? | Not Just Cute says:
    February 3, 2016 at 1:37 pm

    […] reminded me of the irony I discovered as I wrote, “Is There Danger in Play or More in its Absence?”, that in the effort to protect kids from rough and tumble play, we may be inadvertently […]

    Reply
  8. Wait! What Happened to Recess? : Read Along Section 5 – What If Everybody Understood Child Development? | Not Just Cute says:
    March 16, 2016 at 5:48 pm

    […] and disregards what we know about human development and what is needed for children to grow up physically, mentally, and emotionally healthy.  In light of all of that, I can’t see how an argument can be made to support such a […]

    Reply
  9. Recess Responses: Challenging the Common Excuses for the Removal of Playtime | Not Just Cute says:
    October 4, 2016 at 4:16 pm

    […] and disregards what we know about human development and what is needed for children to grow up physically, mentally, and emotionally healthy.  In light of all of that, I can’t see how an argument can be made to support such a […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

search this site

Privacy & Cookies: This site may use cookies to customize your experience. Learn more by reading our Privacy Policy.

I’m Amanda Morgan. Here’s what I’m about…

In early education, there is too much distance between what we know and what we do. I bridge the gaps that exist between academia, decision-makers, educators, and parents so that together, we can improve the quality of early education while also respecting and protecting the childhood experience.

Content Copyrighted (2008-2022), Amanda Morgan, All Rights Reserved

Get Our Newsletter & Developmental Guide

  • Home
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Swank WordPress Theme By, PDCD